Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

David Braddon-Mitchell and Robert Nola

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780262012560

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: August 2013

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262012560.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use (for details see http://www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 November 2017

Jackson’s Armchair: The Only Chair in Town?

Jackson’s Armchair: The Only Chair in Town?

Chapter:
(p.159) 7 Jackson’s Armchair: The Only Chair in Town?
Source:
Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism
Author(s):

Justine Kingsbury

Jonathan McKeown-Green

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262012560.003.0007

This chapter defends a controversial claim made by Frank Jackson regarding how to address questions regarding whether subject matter of one human classificatory practice or discipline is anything over and above the subject matter of some other better understood human classificatory practice or discipline or not—in short, questions of “nothing-over-and-abovery.” Nothing-over-and-abovery is a characteristic preoccupation of the serious metaphysician. A serious metaphysical project is one that aims to produce, or at least explain why in principle it is possible to produce, a complete inventory of all the things or phenomena in some specified class by appealing to some restricted class of more primitive things or phenomena. This chapter is a qualified defense because, although it begins by defending Jackson’s claim against a range of objections, it concludes with a suggested modification to overcome an objection that is considered to have force.

Keywords:   human classificatory practice, nothing-over-and-abovery, serious metaphysician, serious metaphysical project, qualified defense

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.