Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Knowledge and Skepticism$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke, and Harry S. Silverstein

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780262014083

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: August 2013

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014083.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use (for details see www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 15 December 2018

Truth Tracking and the Problem of Reflective Knowledge

Truth Tracking and the Problem of Reflective Knowledge

Chapter:
(p.72) (p.73) 3 Truth Tracking and the Problem of Reflective Knowledge
Source:
Knowledge and Skepticism
Author(s):

Joe Salerno

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262014083.003.0004

This chapter focuses on a criticism of reflective knowledge, which is taken by Vogel as a decisive objection to tracking theories. This criticism finds its roots in Vogel’s earlier work and recurs in papers by Ernest Sosa, who suggests that the externalist idea behind tracking is spot on, but that Nozick’s counterfactual is a misbegotten regimentation of the idea. In its place, Sosa offers his own counterfactual “safety” condition that properly captures the externalist idea, and which is mentioned here to point out that the criticism, which is the subject of investigation, is meant to do a lot of work. In Sosa’s case the criticism is meant to motivate his own counterfactual analysis, and in Vogel’s it promises to be a silver bullet against a theory that has recently found renewed life in the work of Keith DeRose. The chapter argues that the criticism is misguided.

Keywords:   reflective knowledge, Vogel, tracking theories, Ernest Sosa, externalist idea, Nozick, counterfactual analysis, Keith DeRose

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.