Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Majority JudgmentMeasuring, Ranking, and Electing$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Michel Balinski and Rida Laraki

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780262015134

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: August 2013

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262015134.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use (for details see www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 19 December 2018

Electing versus Ranking in the Traditional Model

Electing versus Ranking in the Traditional Model

Chapter:
(p.67) 4 Electing versus Ranking in the Traditional Model
Source:
Majority Judgment
Author(s):

Michel Balinski

Rida Laraki

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262015134.003.0004

This chapter discusses the pros and cons of electing and ranking methods of the traditional model of social choice, and depicts the situation for large classes of methods as more chaotic than is depicted in Arrow’s impossibility theorem. Candidate-scoring methods, including Borda and Condorcet-ranking methods, are discussed, along with their contrasting ideologies. Suggestions are presented for discarding both Borda and Condorcet approaches on the grounds that the former is depicted as the sole winner while the latter is used for ranking designation. Incompatibility between rankings and winners under the traditional model is explored, following the difference between problem of choice and the problem of ranking.

Keywords:   social choice, ranking method, electing method, traditional model, Borda-ranking, Condorcet-ranking, Arrow’s impossibility theorem

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.