Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
ImpostersA Study of Pronominal Agreement$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Chris Collins and Paul M. Postal

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780262016889

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: August 2013

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262016889.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use (for details see http://www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 19 October 2017

Antecedence: Some Theoretical Considerations

Antecedence: Some Theoretical Considerations

Chapter:
(p.25) 4 Antecedence: Some Theoretical Considerations
Source:
Imposters
Author(s):

Chris Collins

Paul M. Postal

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262016889.003.0004

This chapter provides a theoretical account of antecedence in order to show how the structures of imposters and camouflage determiner phrases (DPs) play a role in determining pronominal agreement. Traditional grammar appealed to a concept of antecedent that relates certain pronominal forms to other expressions. Whereas the traditional notion of antecedent is clearly asymmetric in nature, coindexing gives rise to a symmetric, reflexive relation between DP nodes/occurrences. Moreover, the antecedence relation holds in cases where binding does not exist due to the absence of c-command. The chapter examines antecedence based on the following foundational assumptions: existence, the obligatory antecedence of pronominals, asymmetry, transitivity, and linearity. It argues that pronominal agreement should be stated in terms of antecedence. It also discusses first and second person pronominals, Principles A, B, and C of the binding theory, split antecedence, the relation between antecedence and semantic interpretation, and imposters versus DPs referring to speaker/addressee.

Keywords:   antecedence, imposters, determiner phrases, pronominal agreement, grammar, coindexing, linearity, binding theory, split antecedence, semantic interpretation

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.