Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Taking ScopeThe Natural Semantics of Quantifiers$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Mark Steedman

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780262017077

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: August 2013

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262017077.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use (for details see http://www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 15 December 2017

Combinatory Categorial Grammar

Combinatory Categorial Grammar

Chapter:
(p.76) (p.77) Chapter 6 Combinatory Categorial Grammar
Source:
Taking Scope
Author(s):

Mark Steedman

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262017077.003.0006

This chapter focuses on the Combinatory Categorial Grammar (CCG), a strongly lexicalized theory of grammar in which grammatical categories consist of a syntactic type defining valency, along with a logical form and a phonological form. It also discusses the Categorial Lexicon, the sole repository of language-specific information whose sounds and meanings are projected by a small universal set of type-driven combinatory syntactic rules onto the sounds and meanings of all and only the sentences of the language. CCG includes a number of restricted combinatory operations for combining categories that are strictly limited to various combinations of operations of type raising, composition, and substitution. Both reflexive/reciprocal binding and control are bounded under Condition A of the binding theory—that is, they relate elements within a single verbal domain. The chapter also examines relativization and relative pronouns, embedded subject extraction, pied-piping of wh-items such as which and who(m) in noun phrases, coordination of conjunctions, and the expressive power and computational complexity of CCG. Finally, it compares CCG with Categorial Type Logic and Lambek grammars.

Keywords:   grammar, Combinatory Categorial Grammar, Categorial Lexicon, relativization, relative pronouns, embedded subject extraction, pied-piping, coordination, type raising, Categorial Type Logic

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.