This chapter examines what acceptance of Radical Enactive Cognition means for the now stagnating debate about the extent and boundaries of mind. It argues that basic minds are extensive and not merely extended if they are contentless. It demonstrates how REC decisively advances debates about whether minds extend, moving beyond traditional stalemates. It shows how it is possible to refurbish some of the best proposals that have come forth from these discussions if REC is accepted. Specifically, it argues that thinking on this topic must be reframed in terms of extensive but contentless basic minds. It is possible that basic minds might be transformed, through engaging in wider practices, to become contentful scaffolded minds.
MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.