Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Double DividendEnvironmental Taxes and Fiscal Reform in the United States$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Dale W. Jorgenson, Richard J. Goettle, Mun S. Ho, and Peter J. Wilcoxen

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780262027090

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: September 2014

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262027090.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use (for details see http://www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 24 October 2017

Modeling Consumer Behavior

Modeling Consumer Behavior

Chapter:
(p.77) 3 Modeling Consumer Behavior
Source:
Double Dividend
Author(s):

Dale W. Jorgenson

Richard J. Goettle

Mun S. Ho

Peter J. Wilcoxen

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262027090.003.0003

Consumers are represented by an aggregate demand function in many CGE models without allowing for demographic differences. Some allow for different demands by different household types but in a myopic context. This chapter describes a household model that is forward looking, where full wealth is allocated over time by households that are distinguished by demographic characteristics. Aggregate demand and labor supply is given in a closed form representation that accounts for heterogeneity in household behavior. The demand for goods and leisure is non-homothetic, allowing for more complex income effects of policy to be captured. We describe the econometric estimation of the parameters over 27 years of micro data from the Consumer Expenditure Survey and summarize the post-War U.S. aggregate consumption and labor supply patterns. We define equivalent variations that measure policy impacts on household welfare that are distinct for different household types and income levels. Social welfare in this framework cannot be represented by a simple equivalent variation that is derived from an aggregate utility function, we show how a social welfare function may be expressed in terms of our household welfare measures. There is a equity-efficiency tradeoff in the social welfare function.

Keywords:   Household model, consumers, demographic characteristics, household heterogeneity, Consumer Expenditure Survey, econometric estimation, household welfare, social welfare, equivalent variation

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.