Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Agreement and Its Failures$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Omer Preminger

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780262027403

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: January 2015

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262027403.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use (for details see http://www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 12 December 2017

Where's φ ? In Syntax.

Where's φ ? In Syntax.

Chapter:
(p.177) 9 Where's φ ? In Syntax.
Source:
Agreement and Its Failures
Author(s):

Omer Preminger

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262027403.003.0009

This chapter has two main threads. The first concerns the question of the modular locus of phi-feature agreement (phi-agreement). Bobaljik (2008) claims that phi-agreement is postsyntactic, because it tracks morphological case, itself argued to be postsyntactic (Marantz 1991). The author argues that this premise-that morphological case is postsyntactic-is false, and argue from the results of previous chapters that phi-agreement, as well as morphological case, must be computed within syntax proper. The second thread is case-theoretic: the author presents a syntactic case calculus whose results are roughly equivalent to Marantz’s (1991) algorithm. This move is forced, in a sense, by the aforementioned conclusions regarding the modular locus of case and agreement. However, this same syntactic reimplementation is shown to derive the disjunctive case hierarchy-a stipulation, on Marantz's original account-directly from the bottom-up, incremental nature of syntactic structure-building.

Keywords:   syntax, morphology, case, agreement, (non-)quirky-subject languages, disjunctive case hierarchy, Sakha, postsyntactic, morphological case, case competition

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.