Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Transparency in Global Environmental GovernanceCritical Perspectives$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Aarti Gupta and Michael Mason

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780262027410

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: January 2015

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262027410.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use (for details see http://www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 17 March 2018

Tamed Transparency and the Global Reporting Initiative: The Role of Information Infrastructures

Tamed Transparency and the Global Reporting Initiative: The Role of Information Infrastructures

(p.225) 10 Tamed Transparency and the Global Reporting Initiative: The Role of Information Infrastructures
Transparency in Global Environmental Governance

Dingwerth Klaus

Eichinger Margot

The MIT Press

In this chapter, Klaus Dingwerth and Margot Eichinger scrutinize the rhetoric, policies, and disclosure practices in the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), with a specific focus on the role of intermediaries in making GRI information actionable. The authors show that the GRI’s normatively demanding rhetoric on transparency does not permeate the organization’s policies and practices. Moreover, disclosed information does not permit comparison across corporate reporting entities. As a result, transparency is ‘tamed’ in this case, insofar as it fails to facilitate holding disclosers to account. However, commercial organizations and ‘for-benefit’ groups are now using GRI data to produce corporate sustainability ratings. The authors analyze the enhanced prospects for empowerment deriving from the ‘marketization of transparency’ generated by the activities of these intermediaries, who sell their corporate ratings to social investors and others at premium prices. The authors conclude that, while such a marketization of transparency can indeed make disclosed information more actionable, its emancipatory potential is reduced if such actionable disclosure is priced out of reach for most, or if it squeezes out “for-benefit” civil society intermediaries with different audiences and values.

Keywords:   Global Reporting Initiative, transparency, corporate disclosure, sustainability, information intermediaries

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.