Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Transparency in Global Environmental GovernanceCritical Perspectives$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Aarti Gupta and Michael Mason

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780262027410

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: January 2015

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262027410.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use (for details see http://www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 11 December 2017

Making REDD+ Transparent: The Politics of Measuring, Reporting, and Verification Systems

Making REDD+ Transparent: The Politics of Measuring, Reporting, and Verification Systems

Chapter:
(p.181) 8 Making REDD+ Transparent: The Politics of Measuring, Reporting, and Verification Systems
Source:
Transparency in Global Environmental Governance
Author(s):

Gupta Aarti

J. Vijge Marjanneke

Turnhout Esther

Pistorius Till

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262027410.003.0008

This chapter focuses on the politics of measuring, reporting and verification systems (MRV) underpinning theREDD+ mechanism now being negotiated within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. REDD+ (r educing emissions from deforestation and forest d egradation in developing countries, and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests, and the enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries) is a mechanism by which industrialized countries can compensate developing countries for reducing their forest carbon emissions. The authors, Aarti Gupta, Marjanneke Vijge, Esther Turnhout and Till Pistorius, analyze globalnegotiations around the scope and practices of REDD+ MRV systems, arguing that what should be measured, reported and verified, how, and by whom, are fundamentally political questions, although they are often portrayed as solely technical. This chapter pinpoints the role of transparency as a contested means to assess and reward environmental performance, in a broader context wherein forest carbon is becoming a valorizable yet unevenly distributed global commodity.

Keywords:   REDD+, transparency, disclosure, climate change, monitoring, reporting and verification

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.