Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Human Subjects Research RegulationPerspectives on the Future$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

I. Glenn Cohen and Holly Fernandez Lynch

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780262027465

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: January 2015

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262027465.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use (for details see http://www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 10 December 2017

In Search of Sound Policy on Nonconsensual Uses of Identifiable Health Data

In Search of Sound Policy on Nonconsensual Uses of Identifiable Health Data

Chapter:
(p.265) 17 In Search of Sound Policy on Nonconsensual Uses of Identifiable Health Data
Source:
Human Subjects Research Regulation
Author(s):

Barbara J. Evans

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262027465.003.0022

This chapter discusses informational (observational) studies that use pre-existing data or biospecimens. It summarizes existing regulatory pathways for gaining research or public health access to data and specimens under the Common Rule and HIPAA Privacy Rule and explores their defects. Non-consensual (unconsented) access to identifiable data and specimens is occasionally necessary to support socially beneficial public health and research studies where consent is impracticable or would introduce unacceptable biases into the study finding. The existing Common Rule waiver provisions, which allow IRBs to approve nonconsensual access, fail to meet the needs of modern informational research while also failing to provide adequate protection to people whose data and specimens are used. The recent ANPRM neglected this problem, and this chapter identifies needed substantive reforms and examines the appropriate processes and procedures for modernizing the Common Rule’s waiver provisions.

Keywords:   Waiver provisions, Consent waiver, Data, Biospecimens, Informational research, Observational studies, Waiver reform

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.