Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Human Subjects Research RegulationPerspectives on the Future$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

I. Glenn Cohen and Holly Fernandez Lynch

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780262027465

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: January 2015

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262027465.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use (for details see http://www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 12 December 2017

Risk Level, Research Oversight, and Decrements in Participant Protections

Risk Level, Research Oversight, and Decrements in Participant Protections

Chapter:
(p.45) 3 Risk Level, Research Oversight, and Decrements in Participant Protections
Source:
Human Subjects Research Regulation
Author(s):

Ana S. Iltis

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262027465.003.0005

The Department of Health and Human Services’ 2011 ANPRM is a step in the process of revising the federal regulations governing human research. Several sections of the ANPRM focus on measuring and minimizing research risks and calibrating the scope of oversight to studies’ risk levels. This chapter focuses on one risk-related proposal, the proposal to eliminate continuing review of minimal risk research that has undergone expedited review. It examines the goals of the ANPRM, defends a particular interpretation of those goals, and assesses the proposal to eliminate continuing review of previously expedited minimal risk protocols in light of those goals. For this proposal to be consistent with the ANPRM’s goals and the goals of human research regulation more generally, three false assumptions would have to be true. The proposal should be abandoned. Instead, current oversight procedures should be made more efficient.

Keywords:   expedited review, minimal risk, research oversight, research risk

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.