Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Unmaking the BombA Fissile Material Approach to Nuclear Disarmament and Nonproliferation$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Harold A. Feiveson, Alexander Glaser, Zia Mian, and Frank N. von Hippel

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780262027748

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: January 2015

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262027748.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use (for details see http://www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 12 December 2017

Disposal of Fissile Materials

Disposal of Fissile Materials

Chapter:
(p.159) 9 Disposal of Fissile Materials
Source:
Unmaking the Bomb
Author(s):

Harold A. Feiveson

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262027748.003.0009

Since the end of the Cold War, Russia and the United States have declared substantial quantities of their highly enriched uranium and plutonium excess to any military need and agreed to dispose of them. Much more fissile material could be declared excess by each of these states and by the other nuclear weapon states. In both Russia and the United States, excess highly enriched uranium recovered from weapons is blended down to low-enriched uranium, which is then used in light water power reactor fuel. So far, almost 700 tons of excess highly enriched uranium have been blended down. The disposal of excess weapons plutonium and civilian plutonium is much more costly and more hazardous. The first choice of disposal route has been via mixed-oxide (MOX, uranium-plutonium) reactor fuel. France has pioneered this approach in recycling its separated civilian plutonium. Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States all have been less successful, however, and the United States has begun to consider other disposal options. In selecting disposal strategies, key considerations should be the degree of irreversibility being sought, materials security, cost, and international verifiability.

Keywords:   Plutonium, Highly enriched uranium, Mixed oxide (MOX) fuel, Blend-down, Fissile material disposal

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.