Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Complexity and EvolutionToward a New Synthesis for Economics$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

David S Wilson and Alan Kirman

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780262035385

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: May 2017

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262035385.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use (for details see www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 15 December 2018

Complexity Economics and Workaday Economic Policy

Complexity Economics and Workaday Economic Policy

Chapter:
(p.285) 15 Complexity Economics and Workaday Economic Policy
Source:
Complexity and Evolution
Author(s):

David Colander

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262035385.003.0015

This chapter argues that complexity theory has significant implications for workaday economic policy. The complexity vision, which pictures an economy as a complex evolving system undergoing continual evolutionary change, has direct relevance for their workaday applied policy. Good applied policy is not applied science but rather more like engineering. This chapter explains why applied policy should not be viewed as applied science and explores some implications and examples of how using a complexity frame for economic policy changes workaday applied economic policy analysis. It argues that complexity policy opens up economics to a wide range of policies that go beyond the standard allocation policies and supplements them with a set of policies designed to influence the ecostructure within which individuals operate. This adds what might be called formation policy to allocation policy. Formation policy views the market and government not as opposites, but as coevolving institutions, and is designed to influence that coevolution. An example of how complexity policy differs from standard policy can be seen in distribution policy, which tends to focus on redistributive taxes. The complexity policy approach to distribution focuses more on modifying the length and nature of evolving property rights as embedded in patent and copyright law.

Keywords:   Strüngmann Forum Reports, activist laissez faire policy, applied policy, complexity economics, distribution policy, economic policy, norms policy, property rights

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.