Benchmarking the Competitiveness of Nations: Benevolence versus Equal Treatment?
Benchmarking the Competitiveness of Nations: Benevolence versus Equal Treatment?
This chapter presents a method for determining weights that are specific to each country and which reflect each’s relative performance across different dimensions of competitiveness. It focuses on the issue of aggregation, that is, how to select the weights to be applied to the primitive subindicators (variables) used to form a composite index. A simple and often popular aggregation procedure is to assign equal weights to each subindicator. Unequal weighting is desired when the different subindicators do not share the same relative importance. Unequal weights can be derived by informed judgments of external experts, but these opinions often are too divergent to settle on one set of acceptable weights. The cost of obtaining such weights can also be high. The method presented addresses these issues in that it requires less information but nonetheless reveals preferences.
Keywords: weights, competitiveness, aggregation, composite index
MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.