Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Action, Ethics, and Responsibility$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke, and Harry S. Silverstein

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780262014731

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: August 2013

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014731.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use.date: 24 May 2020

Killing John to Save Mary: A Defense of the Moral Distinction between Killing and Letting Die

Killing John to Save Mary: A Defense of the Moral Distinction between Killing and Letting Die

Chapter:
(p.47) 3 Killing John to Save Mary: A Defense of the Moral Distinction between Killing and Letting Die
Source:
Action, Ethics, and Responsibility
Author(s):

Helen Frowe

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262014731.003.0003

This chapter presents an argument in opposition to that presented by Michael Tooley; Tooley’s argument states that initiating a causal process is morally equivalent to refraining from interfering in that process. This argument fails to offer any plausible ground for this allegedly significant notion of interfering in the actions of others such that it has sufficient force to overturn the objection of equating actions which are morally distinct. As a principle of morality, it serves no useful purpose because, in preventing the causal process that will result in serious harm, one’s interference in another person’s actions is not a morally significant feature. Justifying this principle of noninterference also presents problems, as its inclusion substantially restricts the number of cases to which Tooley’s Moral Symmetry Principle applies.

Keywords:   causal process, Michael Tooley, principle of morality, principle of noninterference, Moral Symmetry Principle

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.