Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Better Doctors, Better Patients, Better DecisionsEnvisioning Health Care 2020$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Gerd Gigerenzer and J.A. Muir Gray

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780262016032

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: May 2016

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262016032.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use.date: 21 September 2021

How Can Better Evidence Be Delivered?

How Can Better Evidence Be Delivered?

Chapter:
(p.215) 13 How Can Better Evidence Be Delivered?
Source:
Better Doctors, Better Patients, Better Decisions
Author(s):

Norbert Donner-Banzhoff

Hilda Bastian

Angela Coulter

Glyn Elwyn

Günther Jonitz

David Klemperer

Wolf-Dieter Ludwig

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262016032.003.0013

Bias impacts all aspects of research: from the questions formulated in the study design to the dissemination of results and perceptions by different target groups. The implementation of evidence is not a simple, unidirectional pipeline, nor do target groups operate in a vacuum, eagerly waiting for any information. Recommendations are made to improve the evidence base and message design through (a) public funding of clinical trials, (b) development and reinforcement of information standards, (c) improvements in the delivery of information in continuing medical education, (d) support and development of information sources independent of commercial interests, (e) helping clinicians communicate uncertainty to their patients. Recommendations are also made to correct and/or avoid imbalances in the delivery of health information. Powerful stakeholders can influence the production of evidence (research) as well as its dissemination. In most countries this poses a greater threat to pluralism than the suppression of individual opinions. The interplay between private sources (industry), voluntary and academic organizations, and a broad range of media and government regulation is necessary for a balanced expression and promotion of information. To ensure this, public regulation and intervention may be needed.

Keywords:   Strüngmann Forum Reports, health care regulation, information overload, media literacy, medical education, patient feedback, research bias, uncertainty

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.