Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Animal ThinkingContemporary Issues in Comparative Cognition$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Randolf Menzel and Julia Fischer

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780262016636

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: May 2016

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262016636.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use.date: 28 February 2021

Language and Episodic Sharing

Language and Episodic Sharing

Chapter:
(p.175) 12 Language and Episodic Sharing
Source:
Animal Thinking
Author(s):

Michael C. Corballis

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262016636.003.0012

Tulving drew a distinction between two forms of declarative memory, semantic and episodic. The notion of episodic memory as conscious, reexperienced memory for specific episodes has been extended to the notion of mental time travel, whereby we can imagine future episodes as well as past ones. The further claim that mental time travel is uniquely human has been challenged in a number of studies purporting to reveal both episodic memory and the imagining of future episodes in nonhuman species, including birds and great apes. The basic issue remains somewhat unresolved. This chapter contends that the capacity for mental time travel in humans vastly exceeds that in nonhuman animals in variety, timescale, and combinatorial complexity. These properties may have built on a capacity for the generation of fantasy and the imagination of impossible events. The generativity of mental time travel is a prelude to language, whereby mental journeys through time can be shared and fictitious events (e.g., stories, fairy tales, and myths) can be generated. This chapter holds that the capacity for mental time travel is at best only minimally present in nonhuman species. The complexity and specificity of human mental time travel, and its sharing, may have been driven by the necessities of social cohesion and group planning during the Pleistocene.

Keywords:   Strüngmann Forum Reports, memory, episodic memory, mental time travel, semantic memory, communication, language, planning, social cognition

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.