The Challenge of Novelty
The Challenge of Novelty
This chapter argues for two crucial ideas. First, over deep history and at different times and places, humans have experienced very different physical, biological, economic and social environments. Even as foragers, our ancestors experienced different worlds, but over the last 10,000 years change has become more frequent and intense. As a consequence, human adaptive response to the many environments with which we have coped cannot solely or primarily be based on innate, genetically programmed capacities. Social learning is the engine of human adaptability. Second, while defenders of the social intelligence hypothesis are right to emphasise the cognitive challenges posed by human social environments, they have typically over-rated the importance of deception and manipulation, and under-rated the cognitive challenge of coordination. Humans evolved as technically skilled, ecologically informed, cooperative foragers, and that was a cognitively demanding lifeway, especially given the dynamism of human environments.
Keywords: Social intelligence hypothesis, Machiavellian intelligence hypothesis, cooperative foraging, human social learning, social learning and environmental variation, nativist evolutionary psychology
MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.