Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Elements of Argumentation$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Philippe Besnard and Anthony Hunter

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780262026437

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: August 2013

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262026437.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use.date: 27 June 2022

Abstract Argumentation

Abstract Argumentation

(p.21) 2 Abstract Argumentation
Elements of Argumentation

Philippe Besnard

Anthony Hunter

The MIT Press

This chapter discusses abstract argumentation, which is concerned with ascribing arguments a status, that is, determining whether some arguments of interest can be accepted or, on the contrary, refuted. The main defect of abstract argumentation is that some situations are given the same formalization even though they convey argumentative content which is intuitively dissimilar. Another disadvantage can be put in the following way: Even though an abstract view of the notion of attacks between arguments may intuitively impose it as a nonsymmetric relation, such an intuition is wrong, as some natural symmetric attack relations exist that make the formalization by argument frameworks collapse.

Keywords:   argumentation, arguments, acceptability, cycles, fixpoint analysis, formalization

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.