This chapter examines role that technical affinity played as the radio activists’ group underwent organizational maturation. This largely played out as the systematic elevation of “technical” work and the downplaying of policy-advocacy expertise (even though both were salient in their work). The chapter argues that the radio activists cultivated a technical identity that served to mark boundaries between their group and others in the terrain of media democracy work, which was especially important as they struggled to retain radical activist criticality and to resist being transformed into a “mainstream” nonprofit organization. At the same time, technical identity worked to mitigate potentially troubling disjunctures within the activist organization. It marked continuity between the activists’ past, present, and future, and it enabled them to assign coherence to a diverse range of tasks that might otherwise seem incongruent. The chapter refers to this dynamic as “boundary effacement.”
MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.