Familiar tropes within environmental argument alternate between the pessimism of narratives focused on catastrophism and the optimism of so-called “eco-modernism.” The former relies upon crisis to prompt positive change, while the latter exhibits an often-ungrounded faith in autonomous technology to resolve ecological challenges. By contrast, the central argument of this book is described as both more democratic and more hopeful than either of these more familiar alternatives. In this context, hope is situated between optimism and pessimism, providing an incentive for action unavailable to either of the other approaches.
MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.