Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Brain's Representational PowerOn Consciousness and the Integration of Modalities$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Cyriel M.A. Pennartz

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780262029315

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: May 2016

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262029315.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use.date: 08 May 2021

Neural Mechanisms for Conscious Representations

Neural Mechanisms for Conscious Representations

Chapter:
(p.233) 9 Neural Mechanisms for Conscious Representations
Source:
The Brain's Representational Power
Author(s):

Cyriel M. A. Pennartz

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262029315.003.0009

In this theory-building chapter we explore neural mechanisms potentially fulfilling key requirements for conscious representations. First we focus on the brain's capacity to align and bind elements of percepts such as features in different (sub)modalities. Continuing with the question how we come to experience sensory modalities as qualitatively different from one another, it is argued that no central readout mechanism, attaching verbal “labels” to sensory input, is needed to solve the problem. Instead, the correlative structure in multimodal networks may provide a basis for qualitatively different experiences. This proposal leads to another question: if we assume that individual object features are coded by neuronal firing rate, how should this multimodal network structure be functioning to code such correlative relationships in addition? Dual coding of feature presence by firing rate, and feature relationships by firing phase, offers a promising scheme to solve this problem neurophysiologically. Similarly, cognitive interpretation-the act of interpreting a sensory input as signifying a semantic category-is suggested to depend on iterative interactions between low-level sensory and high-level mnemonic systems. Combining sensory and cognitive interpretation, global percepts may achieve temporary stability by dynamic attractors in coupled multisensory and mnemonic systems.

Keywords:   Cognitive interpretation, Echoing mirror scheme, Feature binding, Illusion, Interpreter system, Modality identification, Multimodal alignment, Phase coding, Rate coding, Semantic memory

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.