Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
European Climate Leadership in QuestionPolicies toward China and India$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Diarmuid Torney

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780262029360

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: January 2016

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262029360.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use.date: 28 February 2021

From Reluctance to Engagement

From Reluctance to Engagement

The EU-China Relationship

Chapter:
(p.97) 5 From Reluctance to Engagement
Source:
European Climate Leadership in Question
Author(s):

Diarmuid Torney

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262029360.003.0005

This chapter traces the development of EU-China relations on climate change and makes three principal arguments. First, the more general development of EU climate change policy generated an attempt by the EU to engage with China on climate change, but this was shaped by the development of the broader EU-China relationship. The inauguration of a so-called “strategic partnership” in 2003 generated a dynamic towards the creation of institutionalized EU-China dialogue and cooperation across a wide variety of policy areas. However, as the 2000s progressed the broader EU-China relationship grew increasingly fractious, and this to some extent shaped the development of engagement on climate change as well. Second, EU engagement with China took the form of a combination of institutionalized dialogue and incentive-based capacity building. However, these were limited by a lack of EU capabilities. Furthermore, while climate change was given high rhetorical priority in EU engagement with China, there is no significant evidence that there was a serious attempt to ensure coherence between other policy areas and the EU’s priorities on climate change. Third, the response of the Chinese Government was characterized by limited normative emulation and lesson-drawing, and also by significant instances of resistance. This resistance was particularly evident with respect to the international climate change negotiations and the inclusion of international aviation in the EU-ETS. Thus, the EU exercised very limited leadership through its engagement with China on climate change, and only then under favourable conditions. Moreover, in significant respects China chose not to be influenced by the EU.

Keywords:   European Union, China, EU-China, Climate change, UNFCCC, Environment, Leadership, Followership

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.