Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Between Preservation and ExploitationTransnational Advocacy Networks and Conservation in Developing Countries$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Kemi Fuentes-George

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780262034289

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: January 2017

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262034289.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use (for details see www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 21 May 2019

Mexico and Biodiversity in the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor

Mexico and Biodiversity in the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor

Chapter:
(p.95) 3 Mexico and Biodiversity in the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor
Source:
Between Preservation and Exploitation
Author(s):

Kemi Fuentes-George

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262034289.003.0003

This chapter introduces the Mexican Mesoamerican Biological Corridor (MMBC), a terrestrial zone in the Yucatán Peninsula threatened by agro-industry and development. Here, a network comprised of domestic and transnational environmental advocates successfully lobbied for GEF funds for a conservation project called the Proyecto del Corredor Biológico Mesoamericano - México, but the members were unable to generate an intersubjective consensus. This lack of consensus negatively impacted project implementation and biodiversity management. Network members, local advocates, and policymakers could not agree on the spatial and social dimensions of what constituted globally important biodiversity, which led to dissent in identifying zones for investing project resources. Without authoritative scientific claims, policymakers selected zones for project activity that were described by local communities and transnational advocates as driven by vested political interests, being both scientifically unjustifiable and insufficiently attentive to the needs of marginalized rural populations. As a result, the first phase of the project was poorly managed, and described by several actors in civil society and policymaker groups as a failure. Further, poor management exacerbated environmental injustice, as the low income communities that needed investment and support to sustainably manage natural resources were instead further alienated from the project.

Keywords:   Mesoamerica, Environmental injustice, Natural resources, Consensus, Development, Biological corridor

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.