Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Between Preservation and ExploitationTransnational Advocacy Networks and Conservation in Developing Countries$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Kemi Fuentes-George

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780262034289

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: January 2017

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262034289.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use.date: 22 October 2021

Egypt and the Migratory Soaring Birds Project

Egypt and the Migratory Soaring Birds Project

Chapter:
(p.135) 4 Egypt and the Migratory Soaring Birds Project
Source:
Between Preservation and Exploitation
Author(s):

Kemi Fuentes-George

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262034289.003.0004

This chapter describes the threats to biodiversity posed by tourism and wind energy development in the Egyptian Red Sea/Rift Valley Flyway addressed by the project titled the Project for Sustainable Conservation of Migratory Soaring Birds. It shows how a transnational network attempted to advocate for biodiversity conservation alongside local communities of Bedouins and policymakers in the Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA), the Tourist Development Authority (TDA), and the Nature Conservation Sector. This chapter also points out the constricting influence of closed political systems. The Egyptian autocratic system is far more closed to civil society influence than in the other countries, limiting the possibility for socialization between network members and policymakers. Since socialization is crucial in building network influence, this case argues that closed or undemocratic political systems are barriers to network influence. In the end, the chapter shows how the Egyptian state captured the GEF project, distributing funds and conducting project activities in a way that has been opaque to the civil society and has not led to civil society participation in natural resource management.

Keywords:   Biodiversity, Tourism, Development, Red Sea, Autocratic system, Civil society, Undemocratic

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.