Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Extraordinary Science and PsychiatryResponses to the Crisis in Mental Health Research$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jeffrey Poland and Serife Tekin

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780262035484

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: September 2017

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262035484.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use.date: 24 September 2021

RDoC’s Metaphysical Assumptions: Problems and Promises

RDoC’s Metaphysical Assumptions: Problems and Promises

Chapter:
(p.59) 4 RDoC’s Metaphysical Assumptions: Problems and Promises
Source:
Extraordinary Science and Psychiatry
Author(s):

Ginger A. Hoffman

Peter Zachar

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262035484.003.0004

Critics contend that the categories within the DSM are fueling the current crisis in psychiatry because they are not valid. As a remedy, NIMH has established RDoC, a framework of psychological and behavioral constructs that will — they believe — better guide the search for the biological mechanisms of psychopathology. Here, we assess the ability of RDoC to rescue psychiatry from its crisis, not only by 1) evaluating its promise of increased validity, but 2) recognizing that psychiatric diagnosis can have an impact on patients’ lives independent of its validity. To assess the former, we delineate possible interpretations of validity relevant to psychiatry, and argue that RDoC faces difficult challenges in achieving what is known as etiopathological validity. To assess the latter, we suggest how the very challenge RDoC faces with respect to validity may counterintuitively serve as a benefit to patients, by reducing the extent to which patients reductionistically re-shape their identities.

Keywords:   RDoC, Validity, DSM, natural kind, translational neuroscience, hyponarrativity, multiple realization, reverse inference, psychiatric diagnosis

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.