Science as Argumentative Practice
Science as Argumentative Practice
This chapter clarifies the concept of science as a set of “argumentation practices,” and explains the conceptual normative framework that integrates different approaches to scientific argumentation related to a number of theoretical developments. These developments include the “practice turn” in science studies, the “rhetorical turn” in the application of argumentation theory in the study of scientific texts, and the mutual exchange between rhetoric and argumentation studies. The chapter also highlights the obstacles and ambiguities in the alignment of key elements of this comprehensive framework by argumentation theorists who have inherited their evaluative perspectives from the ancient Greeks. It concludes that these theorists’ basic evaluative perspectives do not align with another one which takes an argument as product, procedure, and process. A useful set of methods for studying different conceptions of cogency in science studies can be obtained after making the required modifications in the perspectivist framework.
Keywords: scientific argumentation, science studies, argumentation theorists, argumentation practices, scientific texts
MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.
