Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Cogent Science in ContextThe Science Wars, Argumentation Theory, and Habermas$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

William Rehg

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780262182713

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: August 2013

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262182713.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use.date: 17 October 2019

Kuhn’s Gap

Kuhn’s Gap

From Logic to Sociology

Chapter:
(p.33) 2 Kuhn’s Gap
Source:
Cogent Science in Context
Author(s):

William Rehg

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262182713.003.0002

This chapter discusses and characterizes the gap between logical and social-institutional perspectives in terms of argumentation theory after the publication of Thomas Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions in 1962. The gap opened up by Kuhn in his analysis of normal science is a situation “in which two perspectives on the cogency of scientific argumentation opposed one another” across an area of science studies “in which scientific arguments are persuasive but not logically compelling.” The chapter emphasizes that Kuhn’s attempt at the integration of different approaches appeals to revolutionary science as an argumentative process and leads to psychological receptivity while making decisions. It also discusses Carl Hempel’s purely syntactical model of confirmation for the evaluation of cogent evidential arguments, in which he differentiates between the pragmatic and the logical aspects of cogency.

Keywords:   argumentation theory, Thomas Kuhn, Scientific Revolution, normal science, scientific argumentation, revolutionary science, cogency, Carl Hempel

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.