Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Better Than Conscious?Decision Making, the Human Mind, and Implications For Institutions$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Christoph Engel and Wolf Singer

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780262195805

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: May 2016

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262195805.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use.date: 09 April 2020

Institutional Design Capitalizing on the Intuitive Nature of Decision Making

Institutional Design Capitalizing on the Intuitive Nature of Decision Making

Chapter:
(p.413) 19 Institutional Design Capitalizing on the Intuitive Nature of Decision Making
Source:
Better Than Conscious?
Author(s):

Mark Lubell

Christoph Engel

Paul W. Glimcher

Reid Hastie

Jeffrey J. Rachlinski

Bettina Rockenbach

Reinhard Selten

Tania Singer

Elke U. Weber

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262195805.003.0019

What insights about institutional design can be gained when the processing of information is not always under conscious control? It might seem that the very purpose of most institutional efforts to control decision making is to produce decisions that are conscious, slow, deliberative, effortful, rational, and unemotional. Institutional design would thus seem targeted to produce what psychologists refer to as “system 2” thinking. From this perspective, institutional interventions should drive out cognitive processes that are unconscious, rapid, automatic, associative, holistic, and emotional; that is, reduce it to “system 1” thinking. If there is reason to believe that system 1 processes will be at work, additional institutions would aim to bring cognition under conscious control, or at least limit the undesirable influence of system 1 thinking on decisions and behavior. This chapter demonstrates that institutional efforts to improve decision making are not solely directed at producing system 2 thinking. No cognitive process is superior in all settings. Thus, good institutional design should aim at the best match between cognitive processes and tasks. In appropriate contexts, this includes capitalizing on the power of intuition.

Keywords:   Strüngmann Forum Reports, contract system, cooperation, criminal justice systems, formal rules, kinstitutional design, intuition, intuitive decision making, jury system, social norms, trust

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.