Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Catelijne Coopman, Janet Vertesi, Michaeland Lynch, and Steve Woolgar

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780262525381

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: May 2014

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262525381.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use.date: 21 September 2021

In Images We Trust? Representation and Objectivity in the Digital Age

In Images We Trust? Representation and Objectivity in the Digital Age

Chapter:
(p.249) 12 In Images We Trust? Representation and Objectivity in the Digital Age
Source:
Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited
Author(s):

Emma K. Frow

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262525381.003.0012

In recent years, editors of several high-profile science journals, including Science and Nature, have expressed concern about the ease with which image-processing software (particularly Photoshop) can be used to produce aesthetically attractive but scientifically misleading images. In response to such concerns, editors of such journals have been establishing guidelines for digital image processing that authors of manuscript submissions are required to follow. This chapter examines such guidelines and the concerns that gave rise to them in light of STS scholarship on representation in scientific practice, particularly regarding the traditional necessity to invest trust in practices of image making. The discussion in the chapter points out that recent efforts to regulate the use of ‘photoshopping’ in digital image processing explicitly direct attention to the significance of image processing, though they cannot fully articulate what counts as a trustworthy image or as trustworthy practice.

Keywords:   Scientific publishing, Image-processing guidelines, Trust, Objectivity, Ethics

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.