Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Building Ontologies With Basic Formal Ontology$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Robert Arp, Barry Smith, and Andrew D. Spear

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780262527811

Published to MIT Press Scholarship Online: May 2016

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262527811.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MIT PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The MIT Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MITSO for personal use.date: 07 March 2021

Principles of Best Practice I: Domain Ontology Design

Principles of Best Practice I: Domain Ontology Design

Chapter:
(p.43) 3 Principles of Best Practice I: Domain Ontology Design
Source:
Building Ontologies With Basic Formal Ontology
Author(s):

Robert Arp

Barry Smith

Andrew D. Spear

Publisher:
The MIT Press
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262527811.003.0003

We introduce four ontology design principles: realism, perspectivalism, fallibilism, and adequatism. Realism is the view that reality exists independently of our ways of representing it. Perspectivalism is the view that there can be multiple equally correct ways of representing the same reality. Fallibilism is the view that all representations (thus: all theories, all ontologies) should be viewed as being revisable. Adequatism is the view that no one perspective on reality – for example one at the level of granularity of microphysics – is privileged over all others. Each rests on a certain view about how reality is structured and so best represented. Each therefore has consequences concerning how one should go about designing an ontology. We outline four further ontology design principles having to do with reuse, balancing utility and realism, open-endendness in the ontology design process, and “low-hanging fruit”. We provide on this basis an overview of the ontology design process.

Keywords:   Principles of ontology design, realism, perspectivalism, fallibilism, adequatism, granularity, empty names

MIT Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.